Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Prologue-Blowlogue

Sometimes it's very easy to see how we got to the beginning of a story. It couldn't get much more clear, and any lengthy explanation would be boring.

Other times, however, a little information is a good thing--an igniting past or present event--an exposé on something happening concurrent with our story. If this little bit of information mightily feeds that story, it has validity.

If it's just a bunch of backstory or an information dump it's worthless and as a reader, I'm ready to walk.

I'm amazed at the number of people who skip prologues. Puh-lease. Are you kidding me? I have a passion for prologues. IF THEY SERVE THE STORY.

As a writer, I have a prologue in the current ms I'm working on. It's not backstory. It's a murder. Would you skip a murder scene? Sheeshkabobalino.

But here's the real truth. If you write a prologue, it better be important. I mean, MAJORLY important. Not just "good information." That prologue better pull the reader in and give them satisfaction--both initially and how it relates to the story. And Chapter One? That first sentence better do the same thing. Don't be a wuss. NEVER think that you've done your job by hauling someone in to the story with an amazing prologue, and then spending the next gazillion words writing a different book.

I'm convinced that some readers skip prologues because they've read so many unnecessary ones. Don't add yours to that pile. Make it vital--or take it out.

It's all better with friends.

1 comment:

  1. Peg, I couldn't have said that better.

    But I'm wondering why the dog was left alone so long with the toilet paper in the foyer. Where's the owner? What called her away . . . or kept her away? I'm in suspense already. ;-)

    ReplyDelete